Profile: Nato

Formed in 1949 to counter the threat of post-war communist expansion as the Soviet Union sought to extend its influence in Europe, Nato - the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation - is the world's most powerful regional defence alliance.
It has traditionally stated its general aim as being to "safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation" of its members by promoting "stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area".
Members agree that an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against them all, and that they will come to the aid of each other.

OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW FACTS LEADERS ISSUES
Originally consisting of 12 countries, the organisation expanded to include Greece and Turkey in 1952 and West Germany in 1955. However, then, as now, the alliance was militarily dominated by the United States.

Afghan mission was Nato's first non-European operation
In 1955 the Soviet Union created a counter-alliance called the Warsaw Pact, which dissolved after the break-up of the USSR in 1991.
The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland became the first former Warsaw Pact countries to gain Nato membership in 1999.
The next historic step came in 2004 when Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, republics of the USSR until its collapse in 1991, along with Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Romania were welcomed as Nato members at a ceremony in Washington.
Bosnia, Montenegro and Serbia have joined Nato's Partnership for Peace programme - a first step towards membership. At a summit in Bucharest in early April 2008, NATO countries invited Albania and Croatia to join on schedule. Greece vetoed Macedonia's application, but the alliance agreed that the country would be invited when it settles its dispute with Greece over its name. Decisions on Georgia and Ukraine were deferred until December.
Development
Nato was set up in the post-World War II atmosphere of anxiety, largely to block Soviet expansion into Europe. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and subsequent demise of the Warsaw Pact, therefore, left Nato with no obvious purpose.
Since then Nato has used its defensive role to justify a more proactive approach to "out of area" activities - arguing that instability in any part of Europe would constitute a threat to its members.

The US made up part of the Nato-led force in Bosnia
Thus, at the end of 1995, for the first time ever, it organised a multinational Implementation Force (Ifor), under a United Nations mandate, to implement the military aspects of the Bosnian peace agreement.
In 1999 the alliance launched an 11-week campaign of air strikes against Yugoslavia to push Serb forces out of Kosovo. The strikes were the largest military operation ever undertaken by Nato, and the first time it had used force against a sovereign state without UN approval. A 16,000-strong Nato peacekeeping force remains in Kosovo.
In 2003 Nato took its operations outside Europe for the first time when it assumed strategic command of the UN-mandated peacekeeping force in and immediately around the Afghan capital, Kabul.
Changing relationships
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Nato embarked on a series of steps designed to build new relationships with former Warsaw Pact countries and particularly with Russia, which was profoundly suspicious of the alliance's plans to expand eastwards.

Thousands of Nato-led peacekeepers remain in Kosovo
In 1994 Nato offered former Warsaw Pact members limited associations in the form of the Partnership for Peace programme, allowing them to participate in information sharing, joint exercises and peacekeeping operations.
But this simply appeared to confirm Russian fears that Nato posed a creeping threat to its security.
The Nato-Russia Permanent Joint Council was established in May 1997 to give Russia a consultative role in discussion of matters of mutual interest. While Moscow was given a voice, it rarely felt that it was really listened to.
Russia's fears intensified when in 1999 the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland became the first former Soviet bloc states to join Nato, bringing the alliance's borders 400 miles closer to the Russian frontier.
Aftermath of 11 September
The 11 September 2001 attacks on targets in the US are widely seen as a pivotal moment for Nato. The US did not involve the alliance in the international military campaign which followed, even though Secretary-General George Robertson quickly invoked Article Five of the Nato constitution declaring an attack on one member to be an attack on all.

Russia's President Putin at a Nato-Russia summit
Russia's supportive reaction following the attacks proved to be the catalyst for a thaw in relations with Moscow. The establishment of the Nato-Russia Council was agreed in May 2002. This body gives Russia an equal role with the Nato countries in decision-making on policy to counter terrorism and other security threats.
However, the relationship with Russia continues to be problematical. Russia was unhappy that the Nato expansion of early 2004 - when seven new states were admitted - meant that the alliance had reached its borders.
Relations with Russia took a marked turn for the worse after the brief Russo-Georgian war of August 2008. Nato had deferred discussion of Georgian (and Ukrainian) membership until December, but announced that cooperation with Russia would be suspended until Moscow pulled all its troops out of Georgia.
The relations between the Russian and US leaderships became less confrontational after Barack Obama assumed the US presidency in January 2009, and Nato announced in March 2009 that it would be resuming high-level contacts with Russia.

FACTS
OVERVIEW FACTS LEADERS ISSUES
NATO MEMBERS
Albania (from 2009)
Latvia (from 2004)
Belgium (founder member)
Lithuania (from 2004)
Bulgaria (from 2004)
Luxembourg (founder member)
Canada (founder member)
Netherlands (founder member)
Croatia (from 2009)
Norway (founder member)
Czech Republic (from 1999)
Poland (from 1999)
Denmark (founder member)
Portugal (founder member)
Estonia (from 2004)
Romania (from 2004)
France (founder member)
Slovakia (from 2004)
Germany (from 1955)
Slovenia (from 2004)
Greece (from 1952)
Spain (from 1982)
Hungary (from 1999)
Turkey (from 1952)
Iceland (founder member)
UK (founder member)
Italy (founder member)
USA (founder member)


LEADERS
OVERVIEW FACTS LEADERS ISSUES
Leader: Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Anders Fogh Rasmussen took over as NATO secretary-general at the end of July 2009, succeeding Dutchman Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
As secretary-general he is responsible for coordinating the alliance's work, leads NATO's staff and chairs the North Atlantic Council, the alliance's top political governing body.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen
With the announcement of his appointment in April 2009, it was the first time that the military alliance had picked a serving head of government for its top job - a sign that the post would become much more politicised.
"First and foremost, I am a political leader. That's what I was as prime minister and that's what I will also be as secretary general. It's the reason why I have been chosen," Rasmussen told the Danish monthly, Berlingske Nyhedsmagasin. "My colleagues told me they wanted a NATO with a higher political profile with a politician leading it," he told the news magazine.
Rasmussen has served three times as prime minister of Denmark and is the most senior politician to head the alliance.
He first became prime minister when his Liberal Party won an election in November 2001 after promising to tighten rules for asylum seekers and cut taxes. He was re-elected in 2005 on similar pledges and a commitment to Denmark's welfare system. He also won an election which he called in 2007 to seek a strong mandate for plans to improve public services.
He quit as prime minister in April 2009 on being chosen to head Nato.
He backed the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, sent Danish troops there and has urged NATO members to send more forces to Afghanistan, where Denmark has some 700 soldiers fighting the Taliban.
Turkey resisted his candidacy as NATO chief, criticising him for not apologising over the 2006 crisis that followed the publication by a Danish newspaper of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad which caused riots in several Muslim countries. Ankara questioned whether he could contribute to peace with the Muslim world as NATO leader.
Born in 1953, Rasmussen has a reputation for meticulous planning. A fluent French speaker, he regularly spends holidays in France, and is married with two daughters and one son.

ISSUES
OVERVIEW FACTS LEADERS ISSUES
Disputes between Germany, France and the US over the 2003 invasion of Iraq caused one of the worst crises in Nato history. The alliance itself played no part in the invasion although most member countries did. It has since agreed to assist in the training of Iraqi security forces.
However, since that invasion analysts perceive Nato to be shaping a new role for itself. Confirmation of that was seen when it took command of the international peacekeeping force in Afghanistan in 2003. As the world becomes increasingly aware of the global terrorist threat, Nato officials now say the alliance must act to counter that threat.
Further evidence that the shift was continuing came shortly after the move into Afghanistan when the alliance launched a 9,000-strong rapid reaction force designed for swift deployment to troublespots anywhere in the world.
However, the reluctance of many Nato governments to supply reinforcements for the alliance's Afghan mission in the face of an ongoing insurgency in the south has raised questions about Nato's ability to sustain such large-scale operations.